The rapid expansion of AI has generated a heated global discussion on whether it will transform education. While some predict it as the future of tailored learning, others caution against its limits. As a result, people hold a mixed view of AI. It is seen as a helpful assistant, yet it remains an inadequate replacement for human teachers.Supporters of AI combination emphasize its game-changing power. AI tools support learning and teaching in key ways. They adapt to each student's pace, grade work instantly, and provide constant academic help. This tireless support frees teachers from routine tasks, allowing them to focus on personalized guidance, critical thinking, and building a positive classroom environment. At the same time, AI stimulates creativity. By presenting students with complex challenges, diverse problem-solving methods, and vast knowledge resources, it encourages exploration beyond traditional school subjects.However, the key argument against AI is the value of human connection. Education is not just a data transfer; it is a deeply human experience built on emotion, motivation, and social learning. An AI tool can identify a gap in knowledge but cannot detect the anxiety, boredom, or lack of confidence behind it. For instance, when a student's grade suddenly drops, an AI tool might only recommend more exercises. A teacher, however, might notice the student's sadness, discover a family problem, and offer comfort and practical help. This delicate understanding and shared humanity cannot be copied by a computer program. The guidance, the sudden curiosity lit by a passionate educator, and the growth of social skills among classmates are essential to overall development and stay beyond AI's reach.In conclusion, seeing the debate as "AI versus teachers" is mistaken. The future is not about replacement, but about working together. AI's strength is in processing information and personalizing content delivery. The teacher's strength is in developing wisdom, emotional intelligence, and creativity. The most hopeful educational model is a joint one. AI should be a powerful tool for teachers, to improve teaching rather than reduce the human touch in learning.32. How does the author present the topic in the first paragraph?A. By giving examples.B. By defining a concept.C. By quoting an expert.D. By stating a phenomenon.33. What do we know about the advantages of AI?A. AI's help is adjustable and instant.B. AI demonstrates shared humanity.C. AI directly teaches critical thinking.D. AI alone is a game-changing power.34. What's the purpose of the example in paragraph 3?A. To list a teacher's daily tasks.B. To show teachers' uniqueness.C. To display AI's role in improving grades.D. To argue the main cause of poor grades.35. Which of the following would the author most probably agree with?A. AI serves best as a support.B. AI can fully replace teachers.C. AI dominates future classrooms.D. AI weakens teachers' importance.
The rapid expansion of AI has generated a heated global discussion on whether it will transform education. While some predict it as the future of tailored learning, others caution against its limits. As a result, people hold a mixed view of AI. It is seen as a helpful assistant, yet it remains an inadequate replacement for human teachers.
Supporters of AI combination emphasize its game-changing power. AI tools support learning and teaching in key ways. They adapt to each student's pace, grade work instantly, and provide constant academic help. This tireless support frees teachers from routine tasks, allowing them to focus on personalized guidance, critical thinking, and building a positive classroom environment. At the same time, AI stimulates creativity. By presenting students with complex challenges, diverse problem-solving methods, and vast knowledge resources, it encourages exploration beyond traditional school subjects.
However, the key argument against AI is the value of human connection. Education is not just a data transfer; it is a deeply human experience built on emotion, motivation, and social learning. An AI tool can identify a gap in knowledge but cannot detect the anxiety, boredom, or lack of confidence behind it. For instance, when a student's grade suddenly drops, an AI tool might only recommend more exercises. A teacher, however, might notice the student's sadness, discover a family problem, and offer comfort and practical help. This delicate understanding and shared humanity cannot be copied by a computer program. The guidance, the sudden curiosity lit by a passionate educator, and the growth of social skills among classmates are essential to overall development and stay beyond AI's reach.
In conclusion, seeing the debate as "AI versus teachers" is mistaken. The future is not about replacement, but about working together. AI's strength is in processing information and personalizing content delivery. The teacher's strength is in developing wisdom, emotional intelligence, and creativity. The most hopeful educational model is a joint one. AI should be a powerful tool for teachers, to improve teaching rather than reduce the human touch in learning.
32. How does the author present the topic in the first paragraph?
A. By giving examples.
B. By defining a concept.
C. By quoting an expert.
D. By stating a phenomenon.
33. What do we know about the advantages of AI?
A. AI's help is adjustable and instant.
B. AI demonstrates shared humanity.
C. AI directly teaches critical thinking.
D. AI alone is a game-changing power.
34. What's the purpose of the example in paragraph 3?
A. To list a teacher's daily tasks.
B. To show teachers' uniqueness.
C. To display AI's role in improving grades.
D. To argue the main cause of poor grades.
35. Which of the following would the author most probably agree with?
A. AI serves best as a support.
B. AI can fully replace teachers.
C. AI dominates future classrooms.
D. AI weakens teachers' importance.
题目解答
答案
解析
本题主要考查对文章内容的理解、推理以及对作者观点的把握。解题时需要仔细阅读每一段内容，分析作者的写作手法、阐述的观点以及各部分之间的逻辑关系。
第32题
- 本题考查作者在第一段呈现主题的方式。
- 解析：第一段提到“The rapid expansion of AI has generated a heated global discussion on whether it will transform education”，即人工智能的快速发展引发了全球关于它是否会改变教育的热烈讨论，这是在陈述一个现象。文中并没有给出具体例子、对某个概念进行定义，也没有引用专家的话。所以作者是通过陈述现象来引出主题的。
第33题
- 本题考查对人工智能优点的理解。
- 解析：根据第二段“AI tools support learning and teaching in key ways. They adapt to each student's pace, grade work instantly, and provide constant academic help”可知，人工智能工具可以适应每个学生的节奏，即时批改作业并提供持续的学术帮助，这说明人工智能的帮助是可调节的和即时的，A选项正确。由第三段“This delicate understanding and shared humanity cannot be copied by a computer program”可知，“shared humanity”是人类教师的优势，并非人工智能的，B选项错误。文中提到“AI stimulates creativity”，但未提及人工智能直接教授批判性思维，C选项错误。第二段提到“Supporters of AI combination emphasize its game - changing power”，强调的是人工智能与人类教师结合的变革力量，而非人工智能单独的力量，D选项错误。
第34题
- 本题考查第三段中例子的作用。
- 解析：第三段中提到当学生成绩突然下降时，人工智能工具可能只会推荐更多练习，而教师可能会注意到学生的悲伤，发现家庭问题并提供安慰和实际帮助。这个例子是为了说明教师能够察觉学生的情绪并给予情感支持，体现了教师的独特性，B选项正确。该例子并非是在列举教师的日常任务，A选项错误；例子重点强调的是教师的作用，而非人工智能在提高成绩方面的作用，C选项错误；例子也不是在论证成绩差的主要原因，D选项错误。
第35题
- 本题考查对作者观点的理解。
- 解析：最后一段明确指出“The most hopeful educational model is a joint one. AI should be a powerful tool for teachers, to improve teaching rather than reduce the human touch in learning”，即最有希望的教育模式是人机结合的模式，人工智能应该是教师的强大工具，用于改进教学而不是减少学习中的人文关怀。这表明作者认为人工智能作为一种支持工具是最好的，A选项正确。文中强调人工智能不能替代教师，B选项错误；文章没有提及人工智能将主导未来课堂，C选项错误；作者认为人工智能是辅助教师的，不会削弱教师的重要性，D选项错误。